🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a flawed view of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" policies pose an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true challenge confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Economic Gap Between the US and Europe

The data paint a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry 13.5% increase for the European Union. During this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from 76.5% to just half of the American figure. Strikingly, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, roughly 50% of the world’s 50 largest technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

This widening economic gap is driven by superior efficiency gains in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The scene of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This disparity prompts a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU stand? Experts widely concede it is essentially a contest between two between the US and China, with Europe entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several key reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a much more robust and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true unified investment market, which limits the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hinder European business. A US startup can introduce a service under a single regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 separate systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was once viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these hurdles, there are reasons for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to advance serious reform. Notable reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of sweeping reforms.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable strengths: high-quality workforce, excellent schools and universities, and world-class labs. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically boost economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now faces a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, without bold steps to address its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.